Minimal evidence of research and understanding of the topic displayed in mind map.
Showed a reasonable understanding of the topic, with research of the topic evident.
Has a well-developed understanding of the topic and has clearly researched the topic, paying attention to detail.
Content of mind map /2
Little evidence of lateral thinking and understanding of how one aspect of recycling is connected to another.
Some evidence of lateral thinking and understanding of how one aspect of recycling is related to another.
Clear evidence of lateral thinking and solid demonstration of how one aspect of recycling is connected to another.
Presentation of mind map /2
Presentation is contains minimal content, containing only basic graphics and visual presentation skills on display.
Presentation contains sufficient content with evidence of a developing ability to create a good visual presentation.
Well-ordered and visually pleasing presentation with solid content.
Written expression: Clarity and conciseness journal /2
Basic level of written expression. Content could be clearer and/or more concise. Minimal elaboration on ideas and opinions.
A growing level of written expression. Clarity and/or conciseness of the journal is good, but requires improvement. Elaborates on ideas and opinions with some detail.
Journal is clear, concise and well-written. Opinions and ideas are adequately elaborated on.
Linking information from the mind map to the reflective journal /2 Total: /10.
Minimal connection between reflective journal ideas and opinions, and mind map content.
Evidence of a connection between reflective journal ideas and opinions, and mind map content.
A clear, obvious and relevant connection between reflective journal ideas and opinions, and mind map content.
/2
/2
/2
/2
/2
Total: /10.